<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>MoneyVision</title><description>How technology, money and the internet actually work, explained with the mechanism shown and the sources linked — plus the tools built here for the jobs an article cannot do.</description><link>https://moneyvision.net/</link><language>en-gb</language><atom:link href="https://moneyvision.net/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 18:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><item><title>Mining a Zcash coin costs $639, and $476 of that is the machine</title><link>https://moneyvision.net/articles/zcash-valuation-and-mining/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://moneyvision.net/articles/zcash-valuation-and-mining/</guid><description>Electricity is the small half of mining Zcash, and the discount against the $1,129 market price is 8% to 43%, not the 93% it looks like. Also: why that price already assumes most of the success Zcash needs, and what the 2026 Orchard flaw revealed about auditing a fixed supply.</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>investing</category><category>zcash</category><category>bitcoin</category><category>privacy-coins</category><category>mining</category><category>regulation</category><category>risk-management</category></item><item><title>What crypto to buy in September 2026: the boring half and the lottery half</title><link>https://moneyvision.net/articles/what-crypto-to-buy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://moneyvision.net/articles/what-crypto-to-buy/</guid><description>Bitcoin at $78,300, Ethereum at $2,470, and Zcash up more than twentyfold on the year after the first US spot ETF for a privacy coin. What belongs in the boring half of a crypto allocation, what belongs in the lottery half, and how much of each before three catalysts land in one week.</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>investing</category><category>bitcoin</category><category>ethereum</category><category>altcoins</category><category>meme-coins</category><category>risk-management</category><category>position-sizing</category></item><item><title>Which crypto benefits from the CLARITY Act? Not Bitcoin</title><link>https://moneyvision.net/articles/which-crypto-benefits-from-the-clarity-act/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://moneyvision.net/articles/which-crypto-benefits-from-the-clarity-act/</guid><description>The CLARITY Act faces its Senate test on 15 September. It answers &quot;is this a security&quot; with a four-part maturity test and a 20% control threshold — so the assets it helps most are the contested middle, not Bitcoin.</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>investing</category><category>regulation</category><category>sec</category><category>cftc</category><category>bitcoin</category><category>ethereum</category><category>xrp</category><category>altcoins</category></item><item><title>Why crypto prices differ between exchanges, and what the gap measures</title><link>https://moneyvision.net/articles/why-crypto-prices-differ-between-exchanges/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://moneyvision.net/articles/why-crypto-prices-differ-between-exchanges/</guid><description>Five venues priced Bitcoin within 0.042% of each other and Zcash within 0.426% — ten times wider, at the same instant. The gap is not error. It is a liquidity reading, and it is the most useful number on the screen.</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>trading</category><category>exchanges</category><category>liquidity</category><category>bitcoin</category><category>zcash</category><category>market-data</category><category>risk-management</category></item><item><title>Nike stock at $38.40 is a speculative turnaround, not a value bargain</title><link>https://moneyvision.net/articles/nike-stock-comeback-or-value-trap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://moneyvision.net/articles/nike-stock-comeback-or-value-trap/</guid><description>Nike is a speculative turnaround at $38.40. Follow the tariff refund, the dividend&apos;s cash cover and three recovery scenarios to see why an entry near $34 offers more room for error.</description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 21:15:00 GMT</pubDate><category>investing</category><category>stocks</category><category>nike</category><category>valuation</category><category>dividends</category><category>risk-management</category></item><item><title>Someone took 4,000 bitcoin from the Liquid Network without breaking anything</title><link>https://moneyvision.net/articles/liquid-network-hack-4000-bitcoin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://moneyvision.net/articles/liquid-network-hack-4000-bitcoin/</guid><description>No key was stolen and no signer was tricked. A withdrawal from the Liquid Network, Bitcoin&apos;s largest sidechain, looked like every other withdrawal and took 95% of the reserve. Most of it came back a day later. The 602 BTC that did not is now every holder&apos;s problem, in equal share.</description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 14:40:00 GMT</pubDate><atom:updated>2026-09-07T19:30:00.000Z</atom:updated><category>engineering</category><category>bitcoin</category><category>security</category><category>liquid</category><category>sidechains</category></item><item><title>AdSense rejects most sites with the same three words</title><link>https://moneyvision.net/articles/what-adsense-actually-requires/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://moneyvision.net/articles/what-adsense-actually-requires/</guid><description>30 posts. 1,000 words each. A 6-month-old domain. 100 visitors a day. Google publishes none of those numbers, and the three words that actually reject most sites are on no checklist. Here is the whole documented bar, the law Google never mentions, and the file that breaks with a redirect.</description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:24:00 GMT</pubDate><category>publishing</category><category>adsense</category><category>compliance</category><category>privacy</category><category>publishing</category></item><item><title>Crypto amounts are integers: 1 ETH is 1000000000000000000 wei</title><link>https://moneyvision.net/articles/crypto-amounts-are-integers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://moneyvision.net/articles/crypto-amounts-are-integers/</guid><description>A balance of 1 ETH is not 1.0 — it is 1000000000000000000 wei, an exact whole number. Every protocol that matters works this way, and the bugs appear the moment a decimal point gets involved. Why the integer representation exists and what breaks without it.</description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:20:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>integer-arithmetic</category><category>floating-point</category><category>ethereum</category><category>bitcoin</category></item><item><title>FIFO or HIFO changes the same crypto sale&apos;s tax by five times</title><link>https://moneyvision.net/articles/fifo-lifo-and-hifo-change-your-tax-bill/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://moneyvision.net/articles/fifo-lifo-and-hifo-change-your-tax-bill/</guid><description>Sell one coin out of three you bought at different prices and the taxable gain depends entirely on which one you say you sold. FIFO, LIFO and HIFO on identical trades, with every number shown, and why the cheapest answer today is not free.</description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:15:00 GMT</pubDate><category>tax</category><category>cost-basis</category><category>fifo</category><category>hifo</category><category>capital-gains</category></item><item><title>Your first mortgage payment is 81% interest, and nobody tells you</title><link>https://moneyvision.net/articles/where-your-mortgage-payment-goes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://moneyvision.net/articles/where-your-mortgage-payment-goes/</guid><description>On a 250,000 loan at 5.5% over 30 years, the first payment puts 273.64 against the debt and 1,145.83 into the lender&apos;s pocket. Here is why amortisation front-loads interest, what the total actually comes to, and what an extra 200 a month is worth.</description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:10:00 GMT</pubDate><category>lending</category><category>mortgages</category><category>amortisation</category><category>interest</category><category>overpayment</category></item><item><title>The lump sum ends 35% ahead of dollar-cost averaging</title><link>https://moneyvision.net/articles/dollar-cost-averaging-versus-lump-sum/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://moneyvision.net/articles/dollar-cost-averaging-versus-lump-sum/</guid><description>Spreading money in over time is worse than investing it all at once, in most markets, most of the time. Here is the arithmetic, the size of the gap, and why the comparison is usually the wrong one anyway — plus what a 0.5% fee and 2.5% inflation actually take out.</description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 00:05:00 GMT</pubDate><category>investing</category><category>dollar-cost-averaging</category><category>fees</category><category>inflation</category><category>compounding</category></item><item><title>What this site is, and how it is built</title><link>https://moneyvision.net/articles/how-this-site-is-built/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://moneyvision.net/articles/how-this-site-is-built/</guid><description>A short, concrete account of what you will find here, how a page is actually produced, what is measured and what is not, where AI assistance is used, and the things this site will never do. Written to be checked rather than believed.</description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>editorial</category><category>editorial-policy</category><category>transparency</category><category>ai-disclosure</category><category>site-architecture</category></item><item><title>Only one number decides your impermanent loss</title><link>https://moneyvision.net/articles/impermanent-loss-is-a-ratio-problem/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://moneyvision.net/articles/impermanent-loss-is-a-ratio-problem/</guid><description>Divergence loss in a constant-product pool depends only on how two prices moved relative to each other, and it has a closed form short enough to memorise. Here is where it comes from, a worked example with every reserve shown, and the fee yield that pays for it.</description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>defi</category><category>impermanent-loss</category><category>liquidity-pools</category><category>amm</category><category>defi</category></item><item><title>The position size formula most people use understates the loss every time</title><link>https://moneyvision.net/articles/position-sizing-formula/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://moneyvision.net/articles/position-sizing-formula/</guid><description>Position sizing is one division, but the version most traders use quietly ignores fees and understates the loss. Here is the formula, where it comes from, two worked examples with every number shown, and the mistakes that actually cost money.</description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>trading</category><category>risk-management</category><category>position-sizing</category><category>leverage</category><category>trading-fees</category></item><item><title>Why 0.1 + 0.2 is not 0.3, and what to do about it</title><link>https://moneyvision.net/articles/why-0-1-plus-0-2-is-not-0-3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://moneyvision.net/articles/why-0-1-plus-0-2-is-not-0-3/</guid><description>Every mainstream language gives 0.30000000000000004 for 0.1 + 0.2. The reason is not a bug, it is base two, and it has consequences for anything that adds money in a loop. Here is the exact arithmetic, the four places it bites, and the rules that keep it harmless.</description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>engineering</category><category>floating-point</category><category>ieee-754</category><category>numeric-precision</category><category>javascript</category></item></channel></rss>